Product Manager applicants have rated the interview process at IXL Learning with 2.6 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty) and assessed their interview experience as 18% positive. To compare, the company-average is 30.7% positive. This is according to Glassdoor user ratings.
Candidates applying for Product Manager roles take an average of 30 days to get hired, when considering 13 user submitted interviews for this role. To compare, the hiring process at IXL Learning overall takes an average of 24 days.
Common stages of the interview process at IXL Learning as a Product Manager according to 13 Glassdoor interviews include:
Phone interview: 41%
One on one interview: 24%
Skills test: 18%
Group panel interview: 6%
Personality test: 6%
Presentation: 6%
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
I applied through a recruiter. I interviewed at IXL Learning
Interview
Interview was pretty standard, but they completely ghosted me after the second round. Its fine if you are rejecting me, but I find it unprofessional and a bad candidate experience to not hear back whatsoever.
A bit rushed; didn't give feedback which is always annoying; felt a bit random with how they rejected, but didn't get the logic puzzle so that could be why; format was a behavioral question, how to improve the website, logic puzzle
I applied through an employee referral. The process took 2 months. I interviewed at IXL Learning (San Francisco, CA) in Aug 2025
Interview
The process was unnecessarily long and utterly disorganized. I applied for a Product Manager role but was unexpectedly down-leveled to an Associate PM position without explanation. The recruiter took two to three weeks to respond between each step, which made the entire process drag on for over a month.
The first round was a conversational interview with PM, followed by a lengthy take-home assignment that required deep product analysis and writing. After submitting thoughtful, detailed work, I received a generic rejection email with no feedback.
For a company focused on learning and improvement, the lack of transparency, feedback, and respect for candidate time was disappointing. The process felt more like a test of endurance than a genuine evaluation of product thinking. A great mission doesn’t excuse a poor interview experience.