employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Blue River Technology

Acquired by John Deere

Is this your company?

Greedy and corrupt leadership - Engineer Blue River Technology Employee Review

1.0
Mar 19, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

the people and the mission

Cons

I dont even remotely know where to start... the culture and people are suffering. Most problems come from the top who continue to rant about budget budget budget but also continue to promote and reward themselves and better yet, stuff their pocket$$$$$$. Our CHRO is nonexistent. Our HR department only cares about the business and only the business. Feedback and complaints are often ignored.. pointless promotions..no accountability..blatant favoritism..GREED runs this place. This is not the blue river that I used to know. STOP LYING TO YOUR EMPLOYEES. enough of the lip service!

Explore other reviews about Blue River Technology

5.0
Sep 2, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- people - culture - work life balance

Cons

- growth opportunities - staying innovative while at an old company (deere)

1.0
Mar 20, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Meaningful, mission-driven work in ag-tech and autonomy Talented, hardworking, and collaborative individuals at the IC level Opportunities to learn and gain exposure across teams Strong sense of purpose tied to real-world impact Some teams foster genuinely supportive and collaborative environments

Cons

Leadership inconsistency significantly impacts the employee experience. Direction can shift frequently, and decisions are not always clearly communicated or grounded in a transparent long-term strategy. There is a noticeable culture of managing by optics rather than outcomes. How things look can carry more weight than the actual substance of the work being done. Favoritism across teams and leadership is hard to ignore. Certain individuals and groups appear to be given more leeway, protection, and opportunity, while others are held to a different standard. Senior leadership tends to protect one another, which can make accountability feel limited. Concerns or issues raised do not always lead to meaningful change, especially when they involve higher levels of leadership. Budget is a constant narrative and frequently used as justification for decisions, often without sufficient transparency. It can feel less like a real constraint and more like a blanket explanation to shut down discussion. Merit increases and compensation growth are underwhelming and often do not align with performance or impact. High performers may find recognition lacking relative to their contributions. Role clarity and stability can be an issue. Responsibilities may shift without clear reasoning, and expectations can change quickly, making it difficult to feel grounded or set up for long-term success. There is a strong culture of conformity. Employees are implicitly encouraged to align rather than challenge. Asking questions, offering differing perspectives, or pushing back on decisions can feel discouraged and, in some cases, risky. Psychological safety can vary significantly depending on your manager. In certain environments, employees may feel that staying quiet and “falling in line” is the safest path forward. Leadership visibility—particularly at the executive level—can feel limited, contributing to a disconnect between stated values and the day-to-day employee experience.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All