Bank wants to be a tech company, fires 10-15% of employees every half for no reason other than policy - Senior Software Engineer Capital One Employee Review

2.0
Nov 4, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good pay, generous sign on bonus and severance pay Flexible hybrid in office, seem to be slowly tightening though

Cons

They're trying to be a tech company but instead they make a lot of things are unnecessarily complex and using in-house tools that you'll never see outside the company. It was very frustrating trying to diagnose problems with all the extra layers to get through. I liked my time at Capital One though and was a little surprised when my boss, after having bi-weekly one one one meetings giving positive feedback, told me during mid year reviews that I was being put on a PIP due to something that took me too long to work on 6 months ago. What? Why was this never discussed before in our one on one meetings? I don't think anyone would dispute that I was very loud and clear during daily standups about issues I was having while working on that project and how I was solving them or which team I was reaching out to. I did more research and learned about stacked ranking and Capital One's policy of firing the "lowest" ranked 10-15% every half year. So watch out, even when everything is fine and you're consistently delivering on all your projects, being arbitrarily ranked lowest will still require that you or someone else on your team who did nothing wrong will be fired.

Explore other reviews about Capital One

5.0
Apr 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good environment to work in and grow

Cons

Have to learn a lot about the bank

1.0
Apr 9, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company looks decent on a resume, and the standard corporate health benefits are fine. You will occasionally meet some smart, hardworking peers.

Cons

Bait and Switch Hiring: The role I was hired for was completely different from the actual work I was given. Despite raising this to my direct manager, skip-level, and a Senior Director, nothing changed. I was strung along with empty promises of moving to a different team, which never materialized. Toxic Performance Management: The culture is driven by a harsh stack-ranking system. They enforce a roughly 15% PIP (Performance Improvement Plan) quota twice a year. It doesn't matter if you are a strong engineer; someone has to be at the bottom. I even witnessed two peers get put on a PIP after being at the company for less than two months. Poor Compensation & Broken Promises: They claim to operate "like a startup," but they do not pay like one. There are no equity grants unless you are at the Senior Manager level or higher. Furthermore, compensation updates are disappointing: strong performance yields less than a 3% raise (failing to pace with inflation), and they regularly fail to pay out the promised 50% bonus pool for strong ratings. Low Engineering Complexity: The actual technical problems you solve are basic and uninteresting. It is very difficult to keep your skills sharp or learn modern practices here. Micromanagement: There are severe trust issues with engineering leadership. Management relies heavily on micromanagement, and honest communication is rare.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All