Going Downhill - Anonymous employee Imagine Learning Employee Review

2.0
Oct 5, 2024
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great coworkers, opportunity to make a difference for students. Fairly good work-life balance.

Cons

Senior leadership is incredibly out of touch. Earlier this year, the leadership told everyone that nobody would be getting raises for the second year in a row "because of declining sales", and then they turned around and spent millions of dollars on a shiny new office. I used to love working at IL back before Jonathan Grayer took over, but he clearly only wanted Imagine Learning for the name and not for the people. Most people that were part of IL before the merger were forced out within a year or two. Jonathan Grayer doesn't inspire the employees; he uses fear to get people to do what he wants. He even made "Founder" part of his official job title when he was absolutely NOT the one that founded Imagine Learning (Sue Preator did).

Explore other reviews about Imagine Learning

5.0
Mar 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Amazing people, and amazing product

Cons

Nothing much, everything was good!

2.0
Feb 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I worked with many talented, capable, and committed colleagues. The team comprised intelligent professionals who were collaborative and consistently produced high-quality work, despite working under demanding conditions. The role also provided exposure to large-scale curriculum development initiatives and cross-functional collaboration across multiple teams.

Cons

The day-to-day experience was shaped by a highly reactive operational environment. A significant portion of the work centered around revising curriculum to align with evolving standards and business priorities, often under compressed and shifting timelines. Support structures felt limited, particularly when navigating new workflows or shifting priorities. Requests for clarification or guidance were frequently constrained by time pressures and competing demands. Onboarding and transitions required employees to assume responsibilities quickly, with minimal time to absorb systems, workflows, or expectations fully. Many processes appeared to evolve alongside execution, creating a build-as-you-fly dynamic. Organizational clarity was a recurring challenge. Communication gaps, shifting priorities, and inconsistent visibility into broader initiatives made stable planning difficult. This contributed to a culture of ongoing urgency where workload pressure and stress were common across teams. The overall operational structure often felt disjointed relative to the scale of the organization, which significantly impacted workflow consistency and long-term planning.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All