employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Thomson Reuters

Is this your company?

Offshoring, Annual Layoffs, Pip Culture - Anonymous employee Thomson Reuters Employee Review

1.0
Dec 17, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- maybe looks decent on a resume

Cons

I work in the ISRM under the CIO. This organization is so dysfunctional. Nepotism leadership promoting incompetent people. Lots of favoritism here where employees can slack and no recourse if manager likes them. no growth opportunities because budgets are tight and you really need to prove why you need a promotion even if you carry the workload of the next level. Oh and barely no internal mobility because they gradually offshored more and more jobs to India and Mexico to save money! Toxic leadership and new VPs every 2 years who come in and screw everything up. They performance manage people out and have pip quotas to fire people so they don’t give them severance. This is a tactic from Amazon and GE but at least they compensated really well.. at TR you get below average compensation with all the negative of working at a big corporation.

Explore other reviews about Thomson Reuters

5.0
Feb 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Competitive benefits; unlimited PTO policy is still great. - The people keep me here.. we have amazing folks who genuinely care on our team.

Cons

Pressure to keep up with the AI race. Annual increases are limited and should be more competitive to retain talent.

1.0
Mar 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

None, unless you like crappy pay, increased healthcare costs and plummeting stock value.

Cons

1. zero pay increases - imagine busting your butt for an entire year and doing a really great job and then being told that the company has decided to give you a zero pay increase. Is the CEO taking a zero pay increase as well? Doubtful. 2. managers play favorites - managers have their favorites and if you are not one of them, expect a lifetime of achieves (or worse) and little to no support 3. actions never match words - they claim to have values, and will hammer them into your skull through annoying and debasing Teams meetings, but then violate them at every turn 4. they enforce a curve that does not mirror reality. A lot of people get scores that are vastly lower than what they deserve. Company policy says that managers cannot force direct reports into a lower rank to fit the curve, but upper managers will force you to do just that. HR then feigns ignorance.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All