(From a manager) this company will not invest in you - Manager Employ (MA) Employee Review

1.0
Mar 15, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are so many great people working here at the IC, Manager, and even Director Level. People are friendly and always open to helping others. As long as you aren't located near one of the hubs, your role will be fully remote.

Cons

I have been a manager in the post-sales organization at Employ for a few years. If you are the kind of person who wants to feel excited about the direction of your company or supported by leadership, DO NOT work at Employ. However, if you are someone who wants to show up, do what you are told to do, and then go live your life, Employ might be a really good fit for you. For me, Employ is a bad fit largely due to how the company is run. The C-Suite makes every decision without considering “how” their decisions are going to be executed upon. It seems like 100% of decisions at Employ are cut spending or to price gouge customers without providing additional value. Just in the last 2 years Employ has seen: - Every member of the C-Suite turn over except for the CEO - 5 or 6 rounds of layoffs in a year due to missing every imaginable revenue target or restructuring a department - Laid off the head of diversity equity and inclusion - Engineering being outsourced to India - Announced company goals to raise prices for all customers without providing a better product or new features that are really that impactful. - Compensation for employees going from decent to below market value with very poor benefits and employer contributions. Employ has also further cut their contribution to benefits for 2024 resulting in some employees paying as much as 10x more out of pocket for the same or worse insurance selections as in 2023. - Little to no career advancement opportunities (yes this is being said by a manager who saw no future advancement opportunities for themselves or individual contributors on their team) - Issues paying employees on time. - A restructured bonus plan for non commissioned employees where depending on your level, you can earn up to 5% or 10% of your base salary in bonuses. To detail out the result of this change, if you have a base salary of $100,000/yr, the total you would have made from the restructured bonus before taxes in 2023 would have been $510.63 or $255.311. They restructured this plan again for 2024 and the teams would have made even less with the restructured plan. DON'T let the bonus mislead you. The core issue with Employ is that it is 3 totally different companies with 3 similar yet totally different products that the C-Suite wants to call “One Employ.” The core strategy of the company isn’t to have the best product on the market. It’s to churn customers to other Employ ATS solutions so they don’t lose revenue. This is not a bad strategy per say, but the strategy will never work because there is absolutely no investment in making the 3 products even remotely compatible with each other. The sales organization is taught to tell prospects that “it’s easy to migrate Employ brands,” but in reality it’s only easy to migrate your contract to another employ brand. The actual process of migrating to another Employ ATS systems is entirely manual, can take a very long time depending on which brand you migrate to, and has a totally different data schema so anything you report on will need to be recreated or possibly compromised on. As an Employ customer, there is just as much value (if not more value) in churning to a company like Greenhouse instead of another Employ brand as long as you aren’t worried about getting a new vendor approved.

avatar
Employ (MA) Response
2y
Thank you for taking time to share your feedback. I would love the chance to discuss your concerns further and hear some of your recommendations for how we can improve as we move forward. Please feel free to reach out to us directly people@employinc.com so we can connect directly to discuss your feedback and address it.

Explore other reviews about Employ (MA)

5.0
Sep 30, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

New senior management are a welcomed improvement from previous leadership Product direction is more clear than in the past

Cons

No 401k match Flexible PTO benefits employer more than employee since it is not paid out when leaving and not all managers encourage taking time off.

2
avatar
Employ (MA) Response
1y
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. Our new leaders are passionate about out organization, so we're very happy that you see the clear direction of our products. We appreciate everything you do with us!
1.0
Jan 15, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Remote Work, Legacy Employees Cared

Cons

I spent several years at this company and ultimately left due to deeply entrenched leadership failures and a complete lack of accountability, enabled by both management and HR. Leadership turnover was frequent, yet the same ineffective behaviors persisted. Poor-performing leaders were consistently protected rather than corrected, creating a revolving-door environment where competent employees exited while underperforming managers remained in place. Accountability simply did not exist at the leadership level. HR was repeatedly made aware of these issues through formal, documented channels. While concerns were acknowledged, no meaningful action ever followed. Over time, it became clear that HR’s primary function was to shield leadership from consequences rather than address legitimate employee concerns or enforce standards of performance and conduct. The department culture showed little regard for employee well-being. Long hours and high responsibility were treated as expectations rather than exceptions, with no corresponding recognition or empathy. Major contributions — including work that materially improved the company’s operational position and long-term stability — were ignored, minimized, or credited to others. It is also evident that the company is actively pursuing aggressive outsourcing, particularly to India, with minimal transparency around its impact on existing teams. This has created persistent uncertainty and a clear signal that employee retention and institutional knowledge are not priorities. There are talented individuals within the organization, but they are operating in a system that does not reward accountability, integrity, or sustained effort. Until leadership is held to real standards and HR is willing to act instead of deflect, the cycle of attrition will continue.

9
avatar
Employ (MA) Response
3mo
Thank you for taking the time to share this—it's direct, and we take it seriously. Periods of leadership change and business evolution can be disruptive, and that’s been true at times here. We expect a high bar from our leaders and do take action when it’s not met, though we recognize that isn’t always visible across the organization. In HR, our role is to support the business while upholding standards around performance, conduct, and employee experience. We investigate concerns and take action where appropriate, even if outcomes aren’t always broadly communicated. We know consistency is key to building trust, and that’s an ongoing focus. We don’t expect every experience to be the same, but feedback like this helps highlight where we need to improve. If you’re open to it, I’d welcome the opportunity to hear more about your perspective.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All